From: John MacDougall <apakabar@clark.net>
Received: (from apakabar@localhost) by explorer2.clark.net (8.8.5/8.7.1) id SAA13107 for reg.indonesia@conf.igc.apc.org; Thu, 15 May 1997 18:23:42 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [INDONESIA-L] INDEX - I Can Only Oppose with Words
Forwarded message:
From owner-indonesia-l@indopubs.com Thu May 15 18:00:22 1997
Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 15:56:54 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199705152156.PAA15781@indopubs.com>
To: indonesia-l@indopubs.com
From: apakabar@clark.net
Subject: [INDONESIA-L] INDEX - I Can Only Oppose with Words
Sender: owner-indonesia-l@indopubs.com
INDONESIA-L
From: Alex G Bardsley <bardsley@access.digex.net>
Subject: IN: I can only oppose with words (IoC)
To: apakabar@access.digex.net (John MacDougall)
Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 04:40:03 -0400 (EDT)
X-URL: http://www.oneworld.org/index_oc/toer.htm
Country File
Pramoedya Ananta Toer
'I can only oppose with words'
The name of Indonesia's most frequently banned writer, Pramoedya
Ananta Toer, crops up in the media each year in the run-up to Hari
Kesaktian Pancasila (Pancasila Victory Day) on 1 October, the national
celebration of the defeat of Communism in 1965. So too does the
accusation that he was involved in the censorship and oppression of
writers by the PKI in the early 1960s. Pramoedya is held up as a
warning that the Communist threat lives on, as a scapegoat that people
can denigrate and condemn with impunity. He has recently been
interrogated in the subversion cases brought against members of the
People's Democratic Party (PRD) in connection with the Jakarta riots
When a book of mine is banned it's like getting a badge of honour
pinned on my chest, because each banning gets wide publicity in the
international community. The more they are banned, the more response
there is from the democratic world, so the banning of books is not a
problem for me.
The powers that be are truly frightened to grow up. If the reasons
they give for banning books are just, then why don't they ban them
openly through the courts? It's easy enough, much more so than banning
without due process and then being criticised throughout the world.
The real problem is that the legal system in Indonesia doesn't work.
If the authorities were adult about things then they would try to
understand the situation. But they don't. They just want to show how
powerful they are, even if that means killing people. What can we
expect from a government like that? That's why I urge all my friends
to uphold human rights themselves. The authorities here don't
guarantee respect for human rights.
Bannings make no contribution to Indonesia's development. Whereas
writing a book can take years, banning one takes a mere five minutes.
Books by their very nature are the property of the public, not of the
people who ban them. If a writer feels that what he is doing is right,
he should go ahead and write.
When I was in prison on Buru Island I only had two practical problems:
coping with prison officials and with friends who liked to disturb me.
That's all. On Buru I had to fend for myself to get food to eat. But
fortunately I had several friends there who were happy to work in my
place, which gave me the opportunity to write almost full time, except
for the mornings when I had to cut wood for the kitchen stove.
For reference material I had to rely entirely on memory. As it
happened, when I was young I had often read Babad Tanah Jawa [the
Chronicle of Java] in various versions, including that of my parents.
And as a teenager I read a lot of western books. So that helped.
Nowadays in Indonesia there are writers who are in the pocket of the
authorities and there are those who are outside of that world. Those
who are in the pockets of the authorities mainly busy themselves with
producing light material aimed at helping people forget the reality
around them. The more repressive the situation, the more entertainment
will develop to provide an escape from reality. I don't concern myself
with those who are in the pockets of the power-holders. As far as I'm
concerned they don't exist. Their work is simply to glorify their
masters.
The awards I have won confirm that all this time I have been in the
right. Of course they make me very happy. Especially since I've been
denigrated over and over again throughout the New Order period. These
awards give me strength, especially the one I got last year from the
PRD.
From the moment I was called for interrogation as a witness in the PRD
cases I knew what was going to happen. Right from the beginning,
before any arrests had been made, everyone, even the president
himself, was bad-mouthing the PRD. This young people's organisation
was regarded as having been responsible for the 27 July riots. The
prosecutor said that I was pro-PRD. If the president declares the PRD
to have done wrong before the trials even start, what can the trial
officials do? I cannot fathom how any Indonesian can behave like this.
I still want to write. But I can't work somewhere as noisy as this. I
really need to go to the countryside, but the problem is that my
security cannot be guaranteed there. If I go out of town, I have to do
so quietly, without anyone being aware of the fact. That's the only
way I feel safe. After all, I can only oppose with words. Basically,
if I am harassed, I respond. I'm old, what else can I do?
Interviewed by Stanley